Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add filters








Year range
2.
Biocell ; 29(1): 15-24, abr. 2005. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-429662

ABSTRACT

Yoghurt feeding inhibits induced colon cancer in mice. Several studies showed the immunomodulatory effect of yoghurt which can explain this inhibition. It is possible that yoghurt bacteria can also affect gut flora enzymes related to colon carcinogenesis as reported for other probiotics in different animal tumours. The aim of this work was to evaluate the role of yoghurt starter bacteria and their cell-free fementation products on the reduction of procarcinogen enzyme activities (ß-glucuronidase and nitroreductase). Mice injected with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) and fed with yoghurt were used for this study. Mice given milk or yoghurt supernatant (cell free extract) were used to evaluate if the yoghurt antitumour effect is due to the starter bacteria or other components released during fermentation, that could inhibit these enzymes. We determined that yoghurt by itself maintained enzymes activities similar or lower than non-treatment control group, and the enzyme activity was also lower than milk or yoghurt supernatant groups. DMH increased the activity of the enzymes. Mice injected with DMH and fed cyclically with yoghurt presented lower enzymes activities than the tumour control group. Feeding yoghurt decreased procarcinogenic enzyme levels in the large intestine contents of mice bearing colon tumour. The results of this study provide another mechanism by which yoghurt starter bacteria interact with the large intestine of the mice and prevent colon cancer


Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Anticarcinogenic Agents , Antineoplastic Agents , Colonic Neoplasms/diet therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/diet therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Yogurt
3.
Biocell ; 27(1): 1-9, Apr. 2003.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-384256

ABSTRACT

Bifidobacteria are predominant in the lumen of the large intestine and confer various health benefits on the host. They are also used in the preparation of new fermented milks (bioyogurts) or added to conventional yogurt to generate probiotic effects. The colonization of the gut by bacteria tends to be host specific due partly to the way in which bacteria adhere to the intestinal wall. Using a homologous strain of Bifidobacterium animalis in an experimental mouse model, we analyzed by immunofluorescence labelled-bacteria and transmission electronic microscopy the importance of the bacterial interaction with epithelial an immune cells associated to the gut, and the effect of feeding of B. animalis in the immune response. It was able to adhere and interact with both small and large intestine. In spite of this interaction with the gut, no modifications in the immune state (secretory or systemic response) were observed. A heterologous strain of Bifidobacterium adolescentis from human faeces, was neither incapable of binding to the intestine, nor influence the immune system activation, when it was administered during 2, 5 or 7 consecutive days; we believe that using a homologous strain, oral tolerance is developed even when the microorganism interacts with the immune cells associated with the intestine. However, we cannot ignore the beneficial effect of these microorganisms, especially in the prevention of intestinal infections. We think that this property exerted by bifidobacteria is more related to other mechanisms such as competitive inhibition, acid production or others, than enhancement of the immune state.


Subject(s)
Bifidobacterium/immunology , Intestines/immunology , Intestines/microbiology , Bacterial Adhesion , Bifidobacterium/metabolism , Bifidobacterium/ultrastructure , Epithelial Cells/microbiology , Epithelial Cells/ultrastructure , Species Specificity , Feces/microbiology , Immunity, Mucosal , Immunoglobulin A/analysis , Intestines/ultrastructure , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Macrophages, Peritoneal/physiology , Phagocytosis
4.
Biocell ; 24(3): 223-232, Dec. 2000.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-335895

ABSTRACT

The beneficial properties of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on human health have been frequently demonstrated. The interaction of LAB with the lymphoid cells associated to the gut to activate the mucosal immune system and the mechanisms by which they can exert an adjuvant effect is still unclear, as well as if this property is common for all the LAB. We studied the influence of the oral administration of different geneous of LAB such as Lactobacillus casei, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, L. plantarum, Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus. We determined if the LAB assayed were able to stimulate the specific, the non-specific immune response (inflammatory response), or both. We demonstrated that all the bacteria assayed were able to increase the number of IgA producing cells associated to the lamina propria of small intestine. This effect was dose dependent. The increase in IgA+ producing cells was not always correlated with an increase in the CD4+ T cell number, indicating that some LAB assayed only induced clonal expansion of B cells triggered to produce IgA. Most of them, induced an increase in the number of cells involved in the inflammatory immune response. CD8+ T cell were diminished or not affected, with exception of L. plantarum that induced an increase at low dose. This fact would mean that LAB are unable to induce cytotoxicity mechanisms. We demonstrated the importance in the selection of LAB to be used as gut mucosal adjuvant. The different behaviours observed among them on the gut mucosal immune response, specially those that induce inflammatory immune response, show that not all the LAB can be used as oral adjuvant and that the beneficial effect of them can not generalized to genous or specie. The immunoadjuvant capacity would be a property of the strain assayed.


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Mice , Adjuvants, Immunologic/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa , Intestine, Small , Lactobacillus , Lymphoid Tissue , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Cell Count , Immunoglobulin A , Intestinal Mucosa , Intestine, Small , Lactobacillus , Lymphoid Tissue , Macrophages/cytology , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Mast Cells , Mice, Inbred BALB C
5.
Rev. argent. microbiol ; 20(3): 141-6, 1988. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-78144

ABSTRACT

Se estudió el efecto de la administración oral y subcutánea de Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus y Streptococcus thermophilus, sobre la respuesta inmune humoral e hipersensibilidad retardada para el antígeno glóbulo rojo de carnero (GRC). Las especies del género Lactobacillus fueron más efectivas en ambas respuestas, siendo mayor el efecto cuando las bacterias eran viables. La dosis óptima efectiva fue de 6 x 10**9 células. El número de células formadoras de placas (PFC) el título de anticuerpo circulante para el antígeno GRC fue de 2 a 3 veces mayor que los obtenidos en el grupo control. En los ratones alimentados con bacterias lácticas no se detectaron anticuerpos contra sus propios epitopes, pero sí se obtuvieron altos niveles de anticuerpos anti-bacterias lácticas en aquellos animales que habían sido inoculados subcutáneamente con estas bacterias. S. thermophilu no incrementó la respuesta inmune. Los resultados indican que los lactobacilos administrados por vía oral, ejercen una fuerte actividad adyuvante, responsable del aumento de la respuesta imune del húsped. Dichos organismso podrían ser candidatos a ser empleados como adyuvante en vacunas orales


Subject(s)
Mice , Animals , Adjuvants, Immunologic/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Lactobacillus/immunology , Administration, Oral , Antibody Formation , Injections, Subcutaneous , Lactobacillus/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL